“The public have an insatiable curiosity to know everything, except what is worth knowing.” ― Oscar Wilde
We are a curious people. We desire to know ourselves, to understand the world, to relate to those around us, and to learn new skills. This is good curiosity. We ought to encourage it in our children and in ourselves. After all, when we lose our curiosity about life, we take our first step away from influencing it.
I am certainly not against curiosity.
But I am against being curious about everything. And I am all for a limited approach. I am a supporter of intentionally discerning what is appropriate to be curious about. Because you can not grow in one area of life if you are curious about all.
There is freedom to be found in limited curiosity. And there is actually greater opportunity to be found in limiting it than can be found in letting it run unchecked.
Our world has become a constant feed of information and entertainment. And without an intentional, limited approach to curiosity, our minds are left to wander into all areas of society that do not directly concern us. These wanderings keep us from effectiveness. Consider for just a moment some of the things we may concern ourselves with during any given day:
- Celebrity gossip.
- Intimate life details of old friends/neighbors.
- Accomplishments/failures of others.
- Entertainment television/news.
- Political affairs.
- Technological rumors.
- Scandals.
Our information age has made unbridled curiosity a constantly available distraction. With a simple click of the mouse or swipe of the thumb, we are instantly transported into a world that will gladly meet our every questioning. They will encourage us to seek them out. When we do, they will encourage us to concern our minds with more affairs outside our control. And in so doing, we lose all track of the immediate, beautiful world right in front of us.
We would be wise to limit our curiosity. We simply don’t need to know all that we want to know. Instead, we ought to concern ourselves with the potential and the relationships that have been entrusted to us. We would live lives of far greater significance if we did.
Image: Bailey Rae Weaver
Meg B. says
P.S. I also have your book, “Inside-Out Simplicity”. I recommend ALL of them to anyone interested in living a life filled with meaning.
Meg B. says
You are now officially my favorite minimalist/simplicity writer. My husband lives (did I mention L-I-V-E-S) to watch and read what I call “gossip news”. Not to get too personal, but if others are reading this who do the same thing, you are ignoring what is right there – YOUR FAMILY. When you let all of this outside gossip rule your life, you never honestly interact with your spouse or family. The TV must be on during meals…that is, if he even bother to sit down with the family for a meal. When company comes, he turns on the TV so he doesn’t miss anything. He must check the computer each morning and each night…quiet times when perhaps his wife (ME!) would like a bit of attention. Don’t get me wrong – I love the fellow. I just believe he is on the wrong path.
I have your book, “Simplify”. Now, just to encourage you to continue enlightening others, I’m going to order “Living with Less”.
And, finally, I appreciate that you are such a Godly family-man!
From an old(er) lady currently in Tennessee,
Meg B.
Claire/Just a little less says
I think the key word you use is limit. It is normal to be curious about the wider world and people outside of your immediate family but not healthy to be OBSESSED with these things. An interesting read, thank you :)
Reka says
lovely, lovely idea! Great angle also, it has so much to do with simplifying our lives. Thanks
saida says
I’ve just recently begun my simplicity journey and I’ve been focusing on the more palpable issues like de-cluttering and simple foods. I’m afraid I’ve been guilty of wasting valuable time seeking celebrity gossip in the past. Your post has really got me thinking about how we can simplify not just the physical world we live in but more intangible “things” as well. Thanks!
Lia says
I am a big believer in limiting curiosity in this way. I haven’t watched or read the news for about 10 years. Instead I trust that if I need to know something that it will come to me through friends or through the specific blogs I read. The one exception to this is before an election, at which point I seek out information through web searches and talking with friends. I’ve found my life to be much more pleasant and significantly less stressful since eliminating news from my life, and can’t think of something important that I’ve missed because of it.
Glenn says
Lia I am very interested In your comment. Someone asked me a few weeks ago about a news story that had been very prominent for about two days at that time. When I told them I had not heard of it, they couldn’t believe it. But that got me to thinking… With the exception of weather and traffic reports, when was the last time I heard something on the news that caused me to do something differently that day. The answere for me was 9/11. Since then, all I get from the news is stress. Doesn’t seem like a good investment of Tim e to me. I’d be interested in your and others comments.
Lia says
Hi Glenn. The reason I stopped watching the news was because it was making me stressed. At the time I was starting a new theatre company, raising a toddler, and trying to make my creative practice my main source of income. A yoga teacher suggested I eliminate the news from my life and see how it changed me. And change me it did. I use the opportunity of someone being shocked that I don’t know about a news story to tell them WHY I don’t watch the news, and use the proof of them telling me the news as an example of why I don’t need to seek it out elsewhere. I did hear the news on 9/11 because my husband got a message from his brother to check the news. The only other time my lack of news-watching affected me was during the Phuket tsunami. We were in Thailand at the time, but on the other side of the peninsula so were out of the wave’s path. We found out about it via our employers calling our hotel from Japan (where we had been teaching english) to see if we were okay. We then contacted our parents in Canada to let them know all was well – 24 hours after the tsunami hit.
News is stressful – it builds on our fears. I’ve been keeping up-to-date with Hurricane Sandy via friends who live in NYC. Personal accounts are much more meaningful than any spin the media takes on any news story.
Zen Presence says
I’ve never really thought about it from this angle. Interesting. I’ve always subscribed to the belief that the more curious the better, but I can see your point. I guess in a way I limit my curiosity by not watching television, not reading mainstream media, etc…
Thanks for the insight,
Dan @ ZenPresence.com
Brown Vagabonder says
I found your points about being curious in a limited manner, really interesting. To me, my curiosity has always been a winning point for me, but now that I think about it, my focus has always been myself. Curiosity about where I am in life, where I am going, how I do things, why I do things the way I do them, and so on. I like to be able to tell that the reason I am doing certain things is because I have certain triggers inside of me. Celebrities, politics and a lot of world events are not included in my path of curiosity. Fortunately or unfortunately, only time will tell.
AlexM says
I think one issue is also mistrust. We don’t trust that we’ll be OK if we don’t know what is going on all the time. IMO this is so evident with people who are on their cell phones and Facebook constantly communicating their every move and who must talk with someone during every moment — including in the bathroom!
I go away by myself on weekends and check in with my spouse once a day with a ten minute call. People I know think that’s bad — and are shocked that I don’t care what he’s doing when I’m not around (he’s a big boy). When I first started dating my husband I told him not to expect me to be the type of girl who would call and ask “whatcha doing? whatcha thinking?”
I believe part of the issue is that too many people have an inflated sense of self worth and part of the problem is they have to interject themselves into the world constantly too.
Megyn @Unstuffed says
I could not agree more on the celebrity/entertainment “news” part. I firmly believe it is one of our greatest distractors in this society. However, I also think we should be informed of political affairs. I think when we lose focus, we allow ourselves to be taken advantage of. I also think that if we choose to be in the know of political affairs, it’s also our duty to get involved. We live in a democracy, and the whole point is for the government to be run by the people. However, curiosity wanes, and we allow others to make important decisions for our country/state/city/county. I think staying current with the issues at hand is part of our duty as American citizens (can you tell I was raised with a poli. sci. teacher & politician dad?!)
joshua becker says
Thanks Megyn. I’m not against being informed about political parties, philosophies, or candidates. I do think those issues affect us. And in our country, these are issues upon which we can enact influence. But I do think unbridled curiosity into irrelevant issues concerning politics can be more distracting than helpful – that’s why I put it on the list. Perhaps I should have been more specific.
Megyn @Unstuffed says
Ah ok! So more of the general political banter and semantics they get caught up in rather than the actual policies themselves. Thanks for the clarification :)